Once you start planning for crises and making decisions about when to pull people out of hot spots, you end up eventually looking at what some call the "theology of risk". How do you weigh the risk of having people in danger against the benefit of them being there. And how does God fit into the equation?
There are very different views on this from group to group. You basically have two different ways of handling things:
- The organization lets each individual make their own decision based on prayer, personal judgment. The result is that some people leave and others stay on to the bitter end.
- The organization makes decisions for the their entire group with varying degrees of input from members. Decisions to leave could be based on predetermined triggers, policies, embassy warnings, etc.
There are differing underlying assumptions and oddly enough you can find scriptures for both viewpoints:
God has called me here and will protect me:
Ps 138: 7 Though I am surrounded by troubles,you will protect me from the anger of my enemies. You reach out your hand,and the power of your right hand saves me.
Ps. 91:9 If you make the Lord your refuge, if you make the Most High your shelter, 10 no evil will conquer you; no plague will come near your home. 11For he will order his angels to protect you wherever you go.
God instructs us to take note of danger, plan for it and withdraw from it when possible.
The Theology of Risk studies I have seen usually take you through Acts and you note that in some cases,Proverbs 22: 3 A prudent person foresees danger and takes precautions.The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences.
- God acts mightly to protect people - Peter rescued from prison by angels
- God does nothing and people are killed - Stephen is martyred, and persecution erupts and the church spreads.
- God's people take preventative action - Paul lowered to safety over the wall in a basket.
- God's people stay on in spite of warning and evidence of danger. Paul going on to Jerusalem even when told it will mean his imprisonment and also choosing options leading to long-drawn out trials when he could have been freed.
This week I was reading in Hebrews 11 in the great "Hall of Faith" chapter and got to the end, which I memorized back in college. Since all of this crisis stuff was in my mind, I looked at it through those lenses:
Hebrews 11: 32 And what more shall I say? I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson and Jephthah, about David and Samuel and the prophets, 33 who through faith conquered kingdoms, administered justice, and gained what was promised; who shut the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the fury of the flames, and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies. 35Women received back their dead, raised to life again.So far so good. This is what we expect from God - protection and miracles, especially in the Western church. But vs 35 continues without a break to:
There were others who were tortured, refusing to be released so that they might gain an even better resurrection. 36 Some faced jeers and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. 37 They were put to death by stoning; they were sawed in two; they were killed by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated— 38 the world was not worthy of them. They wandered in deserts and mountains, living in caves and in holes in the ground.This is the bit that is harder to deal with, especially if you go into risk thinking God will protect you at all costs. But maybe the people who were flogged, or sawed in two were just people who did something wrong, or fell out of favor with God, or misinterpreted his will and shouldn't have been there. No, that would be too easy an answer because it continues:
39 These were ALL commended for their faith, yet none of them received what had been promised, 40 since God had planned something better for us so that only together with us would they be made perfect.
So they were all people of faith, doing what God asked of them, and commended for it.
This passage doesn't do much to elucidate the Protection vs Prevention debate. For one, the focus is looking backwards after everything is done and over with, rather than looking forward, as one does in contingency planning. It does add in the forward focus in verse 40 with the bit about God planning something better for us so that together WITH us their past victories and sufferings could be made perfect, but then I have never fully understood that last verse.
May God continue to give us wisdom, protect us where needed and give grace to face the suffering when it comes, knowing that it, too, has a purpose that will one day be made perfect.



